Home

Mon, Dec. 14th, 2009, 08:13 am
[i]cereswunderkind: Lovely!

Brilliant headline in the (online) Daily Telegraph:

Gordon Brown has failed. Now it's George Osborne's turn.

What can you say?

Post from mobile portal m.livejournal.com

Tue, Dec. 8th, 2009, 03:15 pm
[i]cereswunderkind: The Phantom of the Archipelago

I had a great deal of fun writing this. I hope you have as much reading it.

Read more... )

Thu, Dec. 3rd, 2009, 02:25 pm
[i]romen_dreamer: (no subject)

Because I couldn't say it better, "click" moment and all, this is reposted verbatim from [info]nomadicjack's journal:


I've probably written about this before, but man, when's the last time you had a click moment? Here's my latest one:

So I've been reading a collection of essays titled Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and A World Without Rape. All of the contributions are really good, but for some reason I never made the connection about why it's "yes means yes" rather than the old "no means no" trope. Well, I was reading over in the Feministing Community blog about Ask Amy's victim-blaming and the author laid it out in such a way that it blew my mind:

Dear Amy:

In your response to the young woman who was raped at a frat party you repeated the old saying, “No means no.” This is an outdated model of consent. Women do not exist in a state of perpetual consent to sex, which they must cancel out by saying “no” in order to prevent a man from having sex with them. Consent means an enthusiastic “yes” from both parties, not just a lack a “no.” I hope you will use your column to remind people that yes, and only yes, means yes.

Aha! So remember kids: yes means yes!

Wed, Dec. 2nd, 2009, 02:05 pm
[i]swanofkennet: New toy!

I’ve just posted my first hub (article) on HubPages

Thanks to [info]satsekhmet for introducing me to this site, which looks like it could give me hours of fun.